Wednesday, November 21, 2012

WHAT I LEARNED TEACHING chapter 188


My urge prayer was always that God would lead me to teach something important. I had already been away from CBC nine years and watched the culture and youth change. Not much, but it had changed, youth executive committees with presidents, etc. were no longer. There was another subtle shift, but full time youth leaders were beginning to step in and take most of the leadership. I wanted to prepare students to deal with change, and hopefully convince them there were to rain up their replacement.
 I always had three goals at the top of my agenda, 1) People are more important than programs, and 2) Be creative with the help and guidance of God. Teaching “how to” can be fun, but may not work as the world turns. 3) Teach leaders to prepare future leaders
In my Intro to CE class I used the prominent text of the day by the LeBar sisters. I agreed with their foundational focus ”The primary focus of Christian education is people not programs. I warned student at the first exam that I would have one question that no one should miss. I wrote it on the board leaving blanks for the two most important words. “The purpose of Christian education is ————— not —————. “ I then filled in the blanks: “people not programs.” I promised it would be on the exam exactly as I wrote it. If they got nothing else right, I wanted them to get this one right. I was always surprised how many missed it. After the first year, I commented in future years about the number who would miss it and amazingly the same percentage missed it every year. Oh well. It’s those kind of things that make teachers want to bang their heads against the wall. How can that happen?
It’s a little premature to discuss what I learned as a Bible college teacher, but all of this was learned half way through the first year. 1) Freshmen know more than seniors. 2) Very few knew that there were two spellings for the word “there” and they didn’t know the there was any difference. “Their” was rarely used. “There” was used for every meaning. Then again, English is a strange language. 3) Far too many students ramble in papers and say nothing and I hated rambling. 3) Far too many spent time telling me what they wanted to do or were going to so and never got around to doing it. Attempting to explain what you were going to do instead of doing it automating dropped a grade. Do it twice in the same paper and you would get dinged another grade. Never saying anything was an “F.” Students get ticked at teachers. Well, teachers get ticked at students. 4) Students that are excited about learning are great fun. 5) The stats about grades corresponding to the location of seat chosen are generally correct. Student choosing to sit near the front get better grades.
I used to see Dr. Dahms in the library searching for plagiarism. I could never bring myself to spend that much time looking for a cheater. Instead, if I suspected plagiarism, I wrote a comment at the bottom and gave the student an “F.” I didn’t use it often, but no one every came into challenge it when I did. “This section appears to be plagiarized. If I am wrong, bring your paper in and we will discuss it.” No one ever came to talk about it. If you are going to steal from a real writer, it had better look and sound like your style. Duh! Honestly, I have no idea what other faculty did. I just did it and probably was hated for it.
It doesn’t take long as a teacher before you get over wanting everyone to like you. You even give up wanting to be friends with them all. When that happens you have a sense of loss, but you do what you gotta do and let the chips fall where they may,

No comments: