In Sunday school, we had been
discussing what constituted being a Christian and could one person really know
if another was a Christian. Since belief is a matter of the heart, what could
one person know of someone else’s heart? We had gone through “by their fruits you can know them,”
and had asked can those fruits be faked? It was a hot topic and we were already
in our third or fourth week of yakking. I loved what was happening. There was
meaningful conversation about what it means to believe.
OK, I need to apologize here. I
never did follow the curriculum and never told anyone I was not following the
book. If something took more than a week, I went with it and kept it going
until it was exhausted. I was somewhat concerned about this and had no idea
what I would say if confronted.
The adult’s working with me in
Sunday school at that time were Betty, a nurse, Dr. Hindmarsh, our doctor, and
Wes, a law student at the university of Saskatchewan. We debated putting
someone on trial for his or her faith. We all agreed it would be very difficult.
We batted around the pros and cons. What if the outcome was — you cannot know.
We knocked that around a bit and decided that was not the worst thing that
could happen. But was it worth the chance and how would it be done? Also, who
should be put on trial?
We considered the logistics and possible
consequences. Wes knew the law best and was asked to be the judge and keep
things moving in the right direction — whatever that was going to be. Wes would
be available to both sides for consultation. We picked a core group of teens
for both the prosecution and defense. Holden Bowker was chosen to lead the
prosecution. He made me nervous. He is extremely bright and determined to win
at all costs. We gave him a team of three others. Rich Hindmarsh, the doc’s
son, and no intellectual slouch either. He led the four-member defense team. We
were still debating who would be on trial but decided to talk to the
prosecution and defense teams and kick around names about who should be tried.
Everyone wanted the pastor, but it would mean he had to be there every Sunday
and with other responsibilities, that was impossible (also, potentially dangerous). A few elder’s names also popped up.
Most of this was beating around the bush. Many really wanted me. I made it
simple. I volunteered
We presented the plan to the class
the following Sunday and gave the rest of the class an opportunity to join
either side than gave the rest of the class time to the sides to begin
preparing their cases. We used another few classes to let the teams work. Both
sides were asked to use Scripture liberally.
I, of course, was a nervous wreck.
I was being a pretty good guy at the time, but there were enough things in my
past to embarrass me and nail me to the floor. I did not tell them anything was
off limits. I did ask that they be gentle. My best hope was that they knew very little about my past. I hoped
and prayed they did not know about my college problems.

The room was packed. Best
attendance of the year. On the first Sunday each side presented their case,
what they intended to prove and how they were going to do it. The judge
instructed the class that they would all be the jury and asked to make a
decision at the end of the trial. Unlike most trails, they were encouraged to
talk about it all they wanted and even give ideas and suggestions to either
side.
During the week each team met with
an adult and laid out their plans. The adults were asked to keep them on track,
but not to tell them what to do.

Guests began coming to class.
Parents, Elders, Governing Board members — even the pastor showed up secretly
hoping my lawyers could prove I was a Christian. I wondered if I would lose my
job if convicted.
Rick was equally competent as my
counsel. He also used a couple of weeks and the class was getting crowded. My
wife became my best witness. I expected the CBC and CTV to be waiting outside
to rush the lawyers demanding to know the outcome. They were never there. What
a disappointment. We could have been the lead story on the news.
The last week was rebuttals and
the jury broke into small groups to deliberate. The judge had to rush them at
the end so we could finish and get to church. Each group presented their
decision on a ballot and the bailiff took the votes to the judge to read the judgment.
1 comment:
Was there CTV back then? What year is this? :)
Post a Comment